The Fed Is Out of Ammunition
A discredited dollar is a likely
outcome of the current crisis.
By CHRISTOPHER WOOD
With an estimated $4 trillion in housing wealth and $9 trillion in
stock-market wealth destroyed so far in the United States, there is little
doubt that we are witnessing a classic debt-deflation bust at work,
characterized by falling prices, frozen credit markets and plummeting asset
values.
[Commentary] Chad Crowe
Those who want to understand the mechanism might ponder Irving
Fisher’s comment in 1933: When it comes to booms gone bust,
“over-investment and over-speculation are often important; but they
would have far less serious results were they not conducted with borrowed
money.”
The growing risk of falling prices raises a challenge for one of the
conventional wisdoms of the modern economics profession, and indeed modern
central banking: the belief that it is impossible to have deflation in a
fiat paper-money system. Yet U.S. core CPI fell by 0.1% month-on-month in
October, the first such decline since December 1982.
The origins of the modern conventional wisdom lies in the simplistic
monetarist interpretation of the Great Depression popularized by Milton
Friedman and taught to generations of economics students ever since. This
argued that the Great Depression could have been avoided if the Federal
Reserve had been more proactive about printing money. Yet the Japanese
experience of the 1990s — persistent deflationary malaise
unresponsive to near zero-percent interest rates — shows that it is
not so easy to inflate one’s way out of a debt bust.
In the U.S., the Fed can only control the supply of money; it cannot
control the velocity of money or the rate at which it turns over. The
dramatic collapse in securitization over the past 18 months reflects the
continuing collapse in velocity as financial engineering goes into
reverse.
True, this will change one day. But for now, the issuance of nonagency
mortgage-backed securities (MBS) in America has plunged by 98% year-on-year
to a monthly average of $0.82 billion in the past four months, down from a
peak of $136 billion in June 2006. There has been no new issuance in
commercial MBS since July. This collapse in securitization is intensely
deflationary.
It is also true that under Chairman Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve
balance sheet continues to expand at a frantic rate, as do commercial-bank
total reserves in an effort to counter credit contraction. Thus, the
Federal Reserve banks’ total assets have increased by $1.28 trillion
since early September to $2.19 trillion on Nov. 19. Likewise, the aggregate
reserves of U.S. depository institutions have surged nearly 14-fold in the
past two months to $653 billion in the week ended Nov. 19 from $47 billion
at the beginning of September.
But the growth of excess reserves also reflects bank disinterest in
lending the money. This suggests the banks only want to finance existing
positions, such as where they have already made credit-line
commitments.
Monetarist Bernanke and others blame Japan’s postbubble
deflationary downturn on policy errors by the Bank of Japan. But he and
others are about to find out that monetary gymnastics are not as effective
as they would like to think. So too will the Keynesians who view an
aggressive fiscal policy as the best way to counter a deflationary slump.
While public-works spending can blunt the downside and provide jobs, it
remains the case that FDR’s New Deal did not end the Great
Depression.
There are no easy policy answers to the current credit convulsion and
intensifying financial panic — not as long as politicians and central
bankers are determined not to let financial institutions fail, and so
prevent the market from correcting the excesses. This is why this writer
has a certain sympathy for Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, even if nobody
else seems to. The securitized nature of this credit cycle, combined with
the nightmare levels of leverage embedded in the products dreamt up by the
quantitative geeks, means this is a horribly difficult issue to solve.
Virtually everybody blames Mr. Paulson for the decision to let Lehman
Brothers go. But this decision should be applauded for precipitating the
deflationary unwind that was going to come sooner or later anyway.
The Japanese precedent also remains important because the efforts in the
West to prevent the market from disciplining excesses will have, as in
Japan, unintended, adverse, long-term consequences. In Japan, one legacy is
the continuing existence of a large number of uncompetitive companies which
have caused profit margins to fall for their more productive competitors.
Another consequence has been a long-term deflationary malaise, which has
kept yen interest rates ridiculously low to the detriment of savers.
Meanwhile, the most recent Fed survey of loan officers provides hard
evidence of the intensifying credit crunch in America. A net 83.6% of
domestic banks reported having tightened lending standards on commercial
and industrial loans to large and midsize firms over the past three months,
the highest since the data series began in 1990. A net 47% of banks also
indicated that they had become less willing to make consumer installment
loans over the past three months.
Consumers are also more reluctant to borrow. A net 48% of respondents
indicated that they had experienced weaker demand for consumer loans of all
types over the past quarter, up from 30% in the July survey. This hints at
the Japanese outcome of “pushing on a string” — i.e., the
banks can make credit available but cannot force people to borrow.
What happens next? With a fed-funds rate at 0.5% or lower in coming
months, it is fast becoming time for investors to read again Mr.
Bernanke’s speeches in 2002 and 2003 on the subject of combating
falling inflation. In these speeches, the Fed chairman outlined how policy
could evolve once short-term interest rates get to near zero. A key focus
in such an environment will be to bring down long-term interest rates,
which help determine the rates of mortgages and other debt instruments.
This would likely involve in practice the Fed buying longer-term Treasury
bonds.
It would seem fair to conclude that a Bernanke-led Fed will follow
through on such policies in coming months if, as is likely, the U.S.
economy continues to suffer and if inflationary pressures continue to
collapse. Such actions will not solve the problem but will merely compound
it, by adding debt to debt.
In this respect the present crisis in the West will ultimately end up
discrediting mechanical monetarism — and with it the fiat paper-money
system in general — as the U.S. paper-dollar standard, in place since
Richard Nixon broke the link with gold in 1971, finally disintegrates.
The catalyst will be foreign creditors fleeing the dollar for gold. That
will in turn lead to global recognition of the need for a vastly more
disciplined global financial system and one where gold, the
“barbarous relic” scorned by most modern central bankers, may
well play a part.
Mr. Wood, equity strategist for CLSA Ltd. in Hong Kong, is the author of
“The Bubble Economy: Japan’s Extraordinary Speculative Boom of
the ’80s and the Dramatic Bust of the ’90s” (Solstice
Publishing, 2005).