|
-- Posted Sunday, 28 December 2008 | Digg This Article | Source: GoldSeek.com
By: Jake Towne, the Champion of the
Constitution The purpose of the following is to
argue that the "gold standard," as understood by most of the public, did
not cause or worsen the Great Depression as current FED Chairman Ben
Bernanke has based many of his papers, speeches, and, to a large extent,
his entire career on. In our contemporary times, I do believe this blame
must be firmly rejected and monetary policy should, at the very least, be
debated in a national forum. Indeed many other economists, such as the
Friedman family, Anna Schwartz, Alan Greenspan, and Jeffrey "Shock Doctor"
Sachs, have all propagated this lie. (photo)
My premise is simple. I charge
that these renowned Keynesian and
Friedmanite-Monetarist-Chicago-Shock-School economists have consistently
used the term "gold standard" to mislead their audiences and readers. For
the sake of brevity, I will focus on Mr. Bernanke as he is the current
standard-bearer of the FED's fiat monetary system. Frequently, these
economists do concede there are differences, but instead of clarifying they
muddy the waters. For instance, in his 1990 NBER paper
Bernanke frequently refers to an "interwar gold standard" and in his 2002 salute to Milton Friedman he acknowledged
that "the gold standard was not adhered to uniformly as the Depression
proceeded." While there may be a paper from the Austrian School of
economics that firmly rebukes the claim in my direct fashion, based on the
mislabeling of the term, I have not come across it (yet). However, both
Murray Rothbard and Walter Block have understood this truth as well, and
dropped the clues. (photo)
Furthermore, there should be very little
surprise that the statist forces have used this trick. Yesterday's
communist "nationalization" is today's "conservatorship." "Hoarders" are
really savers. "Insurgents" are really guerrilla fighters; only a minority
are "terrorists" as our political leaders consistently tell us. An unbiased
observer would call a "war" whether on terror, poverty, drugs, WWII, etc. -
as state-sanctioned murder, destruction, and theft of property. Even
the political terms "liberal" and "conservative" are terms meant to confuse
and divide, as I discovered in one of my first articles "An Hypocrisy of Terms:
Liberal and Conservative". Without more ado, let's dive into
"gold standard" terminology, although if you do not understand the
differences between commodity, receipt, fractional, and fiat money to
please read this first "The Money Matrix - What
is Honest Money? (PART 4/15)". - The
pure 100% reserve gold and silver standard is commodity
money issued in the form of hard gold and silver coins, or receipt (whether
paper or electronic) money issued in lieu of metal held in a money
warehouse. The amount of coinage in circulation plus the receipt
money always equals the total mass of metal in the monetary
system. Rothbard refers to this as a "parallel standard," but be
careful to not confuse this with bimetallism1. I have
found that this is what people commonly mistaken as the "gold
standard." I will refer to the above as the Austrian
standard for simplicity.2
The "international" or "classical" gold
standard is actually a form of fractional money. In simple terms,
one can redeem paper or electronic currency for fixed amount of gold
coinage; America was officially under this standard from the Gold Standard
Act of 19003 until FDR outlawed and confiscated the gold of the
people in 1933. The critical concept to understand here is that the
monetary supply can be inflated or pyramided upon the total base amount of
metal, which of course is conveniently possessed by the
government. So, under the "classical" gold standard, if everyone
decided to exchange their paper receipts at the same time, the country
would be bankrupted; not enough gold would exist for everyone to redeem
their receipts. When the United States executed the Gold Standard
Act of 1900, the first step was for the government to procure a massive
reserve amount of gold, so that everyone can be fooled or lulled into
thinking that their gold can always be redeemed in full.4 (photo)
- The "gold bullion"
standard is one of the systems Bernanke lumps together as the
"interwar gold standard." Under this monetary system, gold coins are never
minted. Redemption in gold is only permitted in the case of large
international transactions; the country's populace is prohibited from ever
possessing the actual money. [Rothbard, America's Great
Depression, p(190-1/409)] The country can proceed to
inflate for as long as they can fool the populace that the disparity
between gold and their banknotes is acceptable. In many
ways, America existed under this unstable yoke from the FDR Gold Theft of
1933 until the Nixon closure of the international gold window in
1971.5 The American citizenry was not permitted to own gold
coins and bars until 1975.
- Under a "gold
exchange" standard a country keeps no physical gold that can be
redeemed. For reserves, only other "hard" receipt money from another nation
that could ultimately be redeemed in gold is kept. The prime example of
this is many European countries adopting the US dollar immediately
following WWI. Again, the country can proceed to inflate for
as long as they can fool the populace that the disparity between the pegged
"hard" currency and their banknotes is
acceptable.
- A fiat monetary system
consists of money that is declared "legal tender" by a government
with no commodity backing. Fiat is Latin for "so be it" meaning money
ordered into existence by a sovereign power. As Rothbard notes, if
one examines both the "gold exchange" standard and the "gold bullion"
standard closely, both are de facto fiat currencies as the people
are in effect banned from possessing the backing commodity, gold.
Now what really happened in the early twentieth century?
This must be understood before we examine Bernanke's interpretation. Up
until 1914, America and most European nations were on the "classical" gold
standard. China operated on a "classical" silver standard. Then
America brought the central bank known as the FED into existence in 1914
via the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Next, to finance WWI, France, Holland,
Germany, Britain, Belgium, and Italy broke off of the "classical" gold
standard and issued paper money to finance their military spending
deficits. Indeed, the four year long war would have only lasted months if
the countries had remained on the gold standard, or had their paper debt
been refused by countries like America! [Lips, 2001] (photo)
Amidst the ruined fields and cities, the
inequities of Versailles led to Germany's infamous Weimar hyperinflation of
1923, which was only one of many national currencies ravaged by
hyperinflation. Germany, Russia, Poland, Austria, and other countries
suffered greatly due to the lack of sound money; Weimar was ended by the
introduction of the Rentenmark, which was tied to gold. [Evans, 2003]
However, on the side of the WWI victors (Britain, France, and Italy) was
America with its gigantic horde of gold. American FED chairman Benjamin
Strong massively inflated the dollar to prop up the Bank of England's "gold
bullion" standard, with no benefit to the American people whatsoever. This
Great Inflation took place between 1921-1929 and the American monetary
supply was inflated by 62%, or 7.7% annualized, as can be seen in the below
table. As the table shows, this gushing spigot of credit was abruptly
slammed shut by the FED at the end of 1928, and directly preceded the stock
market's infamous crash of 1929, as well as collapses in farm prices and
commerce. In 1930, massive job losses gave way to many economists'
soothsayer prophesies of the future, including Lord Keynes' "The Great
Slump of 1930." [Note that several intervals in the table
are just 6 months. Rothbard, America's Great Depression,
p(128-209/409)]  
In 1931 all hell finally broke loose. A cast starring JP
Morgan, the Rothschilds, the Bank of England, the BIS, and the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York attempted to avert the collapse of Kredit-Anstalt,
Austria's mega-bank. The attempt failed when France called in its loans
issued to Germany and Austria, which had formed a customs and trade union
on March 21. The effects of the trade collapse in Europe quickly crossed
the Atlantic, and the FED and many American banks had bought up German
debt, which had plummeted in value. Germany and Austria fought like
wolves to cling to their "gold exchange" standard. The final
descent came on September 21 when the Bank of England abruptly left its
"gold bullion" standard and depreciated madly, causing massive losses to
French banks. Markets hemorrhaged and froze up, and bank runs and panics
took place everywhere. [Rothbard, Depression, p(295-322/409)] To make a long story fairly brief,
President Hoover began the ill-fated government-assisted economy called the
'New Deal,' which FDR fanatically continued. FDR ended the
"classical" gold standard with his theft by force of America's remaining
coin bullion. On March 5, 1933, he cajoled the American public to return their gold coinage
to the banks. On April 5, 1933, he made the private ownership of gold illegal and
demanded that all remaining gold be surrendered to the government. The next
step was obvious, as Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz wrote in A
Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960, FDR devalued the
dollar from $20.67 to $35.00 per troy ounce of gold to
PARTIALLY account for all of the inflation that had
occurred since 1914. Those who were forced into giving their gold to
the banks in March and April now realized a whopping 70% loss of their
purchasing power, which had been stolen by the FED. Those who
retained their gold were now conveniently branded outlaws, and unable to
legally use their gold as currency. [Note: After the FDR confiscation
order was passed, only ~20% of the outstanding gold coinage was returned,
the rest disappeared.] The statists' rule by decree, or fiat rule,
began to fully consolidate its grip upon the world.
America's poor and middle class would languish in the
throes of this 'New Stupidity' until WWII. A few Misesian boom-bust
cycles later bring us to the present-day, as President Obama readies his
'New Stupidity Again' stimulus plan. As the Great Depression was to a
large extent exemplified by high involuntary unemployment, one has only to
look at the below chart to realize that FDR and Hoover were economic
failures. Only until the war boom of 1942 would unemployment drop to
pre-Depression levels. [Of course, this "boom" assisted America, but
destroyed much more of the industrialized world. I've found that
Henry Hazlitt explains the fallacies of the New Deal best in his Economics in One Lesson, chapters 4 and 8.]
(Photo) (2)

Now at long last we can refocus on Bernanke's lies. In
fact, he is fully cognizant of the FED's role in causing the Great
Depression. On November 8, 2002 he
stated: "Let me end my talk by abusing
slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve. I
would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression.
You're right, we did it. We're very sorry. But thanks to
you, we won't do it again."
However, in the
same speech, a cascade of lies flows: "The
next episode studied by Friedman and Schwartz, another tightening, occurred
in September 1931, following the sterling crisis. In that month, a
wave of speculative attacks on the pound forced Great Britain to leave the
gold standard."
As previously
claimed, Great Britain had never returned to the
"classical" gold standard, and instead had been propped up by the
FED! The "speculative attacks" were not speculative at all; they were
committed by those who recognized that this Madoff-Ponzi scheme had
failed! "[In the 1920's] countries that
adhered to the international gold standard were essentially required to
maintain a fixed exchange rate with other gold-standard countries.
Moreover, because the United States was the dominant economy on the gold
standard during this period (with some competition from France), countries
adhering to the gold standard were forced to match the contractionary
monetary policies and price deflation being experienced in the United
States."
Again, a blatant misuse of "gold
standard"! The countries Bernanke is referring to were on the "gold
bullion" or "gold exchange" standards, which are de facto
FIAT! "Friedman and Schwartz's insight
was that, if monetary contraction was in fact the source of economic
depression, then countries tightly constrained by the gold standard to
follow the United States into deflation should have suffered relatively
more severe economic downturns. Although not conducting a formal
statistical analysis, Friedman and Schwartz gave a number of
salient examples to show that the more tightly constrained a country was by
the gold standard (and, by default, the more closely bound to
follow U.S. monetary policies), the more severe were both its
monetary contraction and its declines in prices and output."
(photo)
Friedman and
Schwartz had no "insight" here! In fact they were blinded! Countries on the
"gold exchange" standard were constantly devaluing their currencies by
repegging to the dollar or the British pound, although they were correct in
that FED dollar inflation secretly contributed to further
debasement. Bernanke in his 2004 speech "Money, Gold, and the Great
Depression": "After 1918, when the war
ended, nations around the world made extensive efforts to reconstitute the
gold standard, believing that it would be a key element in the return to
normal functioning of the international economic system. Great
Britain was among the first of the major countries to return to the gold
standard, in 1925, and by 1929 the great majority of the world's nations
had done so. Unlike the gold standard before World War I, however,
the gold standard as reconstituted in the 1920s proved to be both unstable
and destabilizing."
He's lying through his
teeth! Great Britain never returned to the "classical"
gold standard after 1914! In 1929, NONE of the countries
that had left the "classical" gold standard returned to it!
NONE ever would! Sure, he admits that the post-WWI "gold
standard" did not work well, but he does not state the true reason why!
The British pound, the German mark, the Italian lira, et cetera were
all just fiat in disguise! Here's classic
Bernanke: "The existence of the gold standard
helps to explain why the world economic decline was both deep and broadly
international."
Hogwash! First, WWI would
have been greatly shortened and the economic decline would never have
occurred if the world had not left the "classical" gold standard.
Second, we have already seen how the FED, Hoover, FDR, and especially the
British lack of fiscal discipline widened the depth and breadth of the
Depression, not the "gold standard"! "If declines in the money supply induced by adherence to
the gold standard were a principal reason for economic depression, then
countries leaving gold earlier should have been able to avoid the worst of
the Depression and begin an earlier process of recovery. The evidence
strongly supports this implication. For example, Great Britain and
Scandinavia, which left the gold standard in 1931, recovered much earlier
than France and Belgium, which stubbornly remained on gold. As Friedman and
Schwartz noted in their book, countries such as China - which used a silver
standard rather than a gold standard - avoided the Depression almost
entirely. The finding that the time at which a country left the gold
standard is the key determinant of the severity of its depression and the
timing of its recovery has been shown to hold for literally dozens of
countries, including developing countries. This intriguing result not only
provides additional evidence for the importance of monetary factors in the
Depression, it also explains why the timing of recovery from the Depression
differed across countries."
Sorry for sounding like a broken record, but let's
continue. First, all the countries Bernanke mentions were not on the
"classical" gold standard, just a weak fiat facade. For one of his key
supporting pieces of evidence, Bernanke fails to complete a thorough
eco-political study of China, including the theft of the populace's silver
by their government, and the MINOR detail that China was
under massive upheaval and wracked by civil war in the mid-1920s, so they
just MIGHT have been fudging some of their economic
numbers. Comparing the Chinese economy with the likes of Britain and France
in 1925 is as silly as comparing the Somalian economy with Japan's in 2008.
In his 1990 NBER paper "The Gold Standard,
Deflation, and Financial Crisis in the Great Depression," Bernanke does
reveal he is aware of the Genoa Conference of 1922 that promoted the "gold
exchange standard." It is also interesting that in 1990 Bernanke fairly
consistently uses the term "interwar gold standard," while in his recent
speeches and writings he just uses "gold standard." At no point does he
clearly define the "interwar gold standard." In fact, he even lists the
League of Nations claim that by 1925, 28 of 48 major currencies were once
again "pegged to gold."
Maybe when this depression finally ends in
the hyperinflationary death of a bunch more fiat currencies, I will write a
paper to correct all the Keynesian and Friedmanite gaffes Bernanke and
others continue to make. Hopefully, I can call it "How the Austrian
Standard Cured Inflation and Stopped the Financial Crisis of the Greater
Depression." I will be sure to correctly define the Austrian Standard
first. Jake, the Champion of the Constitution
[Reach the Author
Here!]
-- Posted Sunday, 28 December 2008 |
|