|
Could the Fed Be
Manufacturing Another Crash?
|
|
|
A week ago, I wrote an essay titled Bonds, Not
Stocks, Will be the Big Story in 2010. In it, I detailed how the US
Treasury is now facing a debt spiral: a situation where it needs to issue
roughly $150 billion of new debt per month WHILE rolling over TRILLIONS in
existing debt at a time when investors are willing to lend to it for
shorter and shorter periods of time.
Indeed, in the next two months alone, the US must roll
over $133 billion in debt.
And this is coming at the precise time that the US will
begin issuing roughly $150-300 billion in new debt to finance our $1.5
trillion deficit.
The big question now is… WHO’S going
to be buying this stuff?
Historically foreign investors and foreign governments were
the biggest buyers of US debt. Indeed, they were the largest in 2009,
buying up roughly $700 billion worth of Treasury securities, representing a
23% increase from their purchases of 2008.
On the surface this data makes it look like foreign
governments haven’t lost their appetite for US debt… until you
look at the data on a month-by-month basis. According to the Treasury
Department’s Treasury International Capital Data for
October, Foreign Governments have actually become SELLERS of long-term US
debt that month. The report notes:
Net foreign acquisition of long-term securities,
taking into account adjustments, is estimated to have been $8.3
billion (Graham’s note: we issued nearly $2 TRILLION
in debt in 2009).
Foreign holdings of dollar-denominated short-term U.S.
securities, including Treasury bills, and other custody
liabilities decreased $43.9 billion. Foreign
holdings of Treasury bills decreased $38.3
billion.
Thus we see that the annual increase in foreign government
purchase of US debt came largely at the BEGINNING or first half of 2009: by
October foreign governments were actually SELLING long-term US debt.
Suffice to say, foreign governments likely will not be
stepping in to pick up the slack in the Treasury market. The next biggest
purchaser of US debt behind Foreign Governments in 2009 was the Federal
Reserve itself via its Quantitative Easing Program. Given that unpopularity
of this policy it is unlikely to be repeated (at least not in a form large
enough to pick up any slack in the Treasury markets).
So what about state or local governments, pension funds, or
insurance companies (historically decent sized buyers of US debt)? Eric
Sprott of Sprott Asset Management points out that according to Treasury
data these groups have either been net sellers or small buyers of Treasury
debt in 2009.
The likelihood that these groups suddenly buy hundreds of
billions of dollars of Treasuries in 2010 is minimal... the same goes for
“other investors” (the third largest group of US debt buyers in
2009, buying nearly $700 billion in US debt and comprised of
“Individuals, Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSE), Brokers and
Dealers, Bank Personal Trusts and Estates, Corporate and Non-Corporate
Businesses, Individuals and Other Investors).
Unless of course we have ANOTHER Crash in the stock
market.
Think about it… The US, if it were treated like a
corporation, is effectively bankrupt. And it has to issue a MASSIVE amount
of new debt while rolling over TRILLIONS in old debt at the VERY time that
most historic buyers of US debt are losing interest in lending to the US
for any period longer than a few years.
So how do you create interest?
Simple, let the stock market collapse. The “flight to
safety” that would follow would push billions if not hundreds of
billions of dollars into Treasuries, soaking up the debt issuance and
roll-over with little difficulty.
And why not? Stocks have added $6 trillion to the US
household “budget.” Let a third of that slide into Treasuries
and you’ve covered the current US deficit for 2010 and S&P 500
would still be at 950 or so.
Please bear in mind, that I am NOT saying the Fed and
friends will do this. But given that the Fed is coming under increased
scrutiny as public outrage rises, letting stocks come unhinged it perhaps
the least politically controversial move the Fed could make (as opposed to
another Quantitative Easing Program which would REALLY get the public
upset). It would do the following:
- End the liquidity fueled rally while bringing stocks closer to
reality (the higher the rally goes the more painful the subsequent
correction will be)
- Create great demand for Treasuries (something the US desperately
NEEDS in 2010)
- Have relatively minor political ramifications compared to another
Quantitative Easing Program or more Bailouts (the public is pissed,
Democrats have begun jumping ship, and we ARE in an election year)
Could the Fed be preparing another stock crash to flood the
bond market with demand? Who knows? But it would make plenty of sense to
me.
Gold certainly seems to be forecasting another round of
deflation. In the last month, Gold has staged a serious correction and then
a brief bounce. As I write it is right around its 50-DMA.
This is a CRITICAL juncture for the precious metal. If Gold
cannot break above this level in a meaningful way, the correction is not
over and we will likely be testing the 200-DMA.
Aside from the 50-DMA, Gold also has overhead resistance at
$1,140. I wish to add that when the precious metal broke below its
upper-trendline said trend-line appears to have become upwards resistance
as well:
In plain terms, IF Gold does not break above $1,140 quickly
and meaningfully, it is primed for greater losses and we shall be going
short. However, IF Gold breaks above these levels, we’ll be going
long as it indicates the upward momentum is strong here.
I’m watching this investment closely. As soon as
it’s clear what to do, we shall act.
Graham Summers
****
Swing by www.gainspainscapital
.com/roundtwo.html to pick up a FREE copy today!