|
The Trend is Your
Friend
|
 |
By Howard Katz
Jun 7 2010 12:15PM
|
 |
|
|
Playing the markets is not an easy occupation. One
normally thinks that it involves buying at the bottom and selling at the
top. But in fact, one must make a new decision every trading
day. We had a good illustration of this on Friday, June 4 when gold
plunged sharply in the morning, and at the same time the dollar broke out
of a small triangle to the upside. Since the dollar often moves
opposite to gold, this was a bearish signal for gold. A year’s
trading, then requires 250 decisions. A decade’s trading
requires 2,500 decisions. Fortunately, to make money we do not need
to get all of them right. A good majority will suffice.

Above is a daily basis chart of the U.S. dollar
(candlestick) showing Friday’s breakout to the upside confirmed by a
high volume day. With gold plunging Friday morning and the dollar
breaking out upside, it was a scary moment for gold bugs.
Fortunately, gold rallied strongly in the afternoon. It made up all
the morning’s losses and put on a solid gain. Indeed, GLD (the
gold trading instrument which has the latest close) completed a bullish
engulfing pattern, a candlestick signal predicting higher prices.
It seems that the markets are saying that the old scenario
of gold moving opposite to the dollar (and with the euro), which dominated
much of the last decade, has changed. Now the scenario is that all
paper money is collapsing against gold. And for the past 4 months,
the dollar’s rise against the euro (and other currencies) has been
accompanied by a nice gain in gold.
This illustrates the importance of perspective in trading
the markets. All of a sudden, as soon as your own money is at risk,
everything looks different. When you were paper trading, you were
calm and rational. But now your perspective has collapsed.
“Honey, could I have the paper? I need to see what my stock did
today.” An hour now feels like a week, and waiting for the end
of the day seems like eternity. With your perspective out of whack,
your judgement follows, and soon your paper trading profits turn to real
losses. (This, by the way, is why I do not recommend paper
trading. Instead I recommend trading with modest amounts of
money. That will give you the sense of what speculation is really
like, and you will learn to make sound judgements in difficult
circumstances.)

And yet, the long term trend is so much easier to play than
the short. Look at the trend in this gold bull market. Surely
this trend has been our friend. All commodity markets, by the way,
are not like this. Each has its own peculiarities, which must be
learned by experience. But gold is a good chart commodity. It
is produced all over the world, and it is purchased all over the
world. Many people, each day, are buying it and selling it.
That, of course, is what technical patterns are intended to comprehend, how
the average person thinks and what he will do.
The average person, as I have noted, commits the fallacy of
the fair price. He believes the teaching of Thomas Aquinas that there
is a fair price for every good and that a good ought to sell for its fair
price. He does not understand the teaching of Adam Smith that any
price agreed upon between buyer and seller is fair, and therefore the
crucial determinant of price is supply and demand.
Let us say that our average fellow makes the mistake of
selling gold on Feb. 5, at $1,050. “Oh, did that
hurt.” He wishes he had not made that move. Well, the
answer seems simple enough. If you regret selling, then go in and buy
it back. “Oh, no, I couldn’t do that.”
Why, having regretted his sale, can he not go back in and
buy? This puts him long of gold again and corrects his mistake.
But he cannot buy here at $1,220 because the fair price for gold is $1,050,
and he would be overpaying by $170 (he thinks). In short, because
Thomas Aquinas did not tell him how to calculate the fair price, he
confuses the fair price with the price that is in his mind. It could
be the price he is used to because the good has been trading there for a
long time. It could be a high or low point on a chart that stands out
and comes to people’s attention. It could be a price with a
great deal of volume. And, very frequently, it is the price at which
he sold (or bought).
Therefore, if the price of gold did get back down to
$1,050, our average fellow would rush to buy it because it was now back
down to its fair price. And since $1,050 stands out on the charts,
many other people would rush to buy at the same time. This buying is
called support, and $1,050 is a support level. The corresponding
level at which many people will come in to sell is called resistance.
Once we understand the support and resistance levels, by
inference we can figure out the larger trend. In the chart above,
gold continues to go to new highs, breaking resistance to do so.
Every time resistance is broken the bullish trend is reconfirmed.
Look at how many times this has happened over the past 10 years.
The old timers noted this phenomenon many years ago.
Most market trends are caused by large-scale forces too big for most
traders to comprehend. They wind up assuming that current prices are
near the fair price, and they are reluctant to pay more. This
reluctance slows down the bull trend, but the fundamental, large scale
force keeps tilting the balance to the upside. In effect, the idea of
a fair price keeps the market undervalued for a long, long time. The
old timers expressed this by saying, “the trend is your
friend,” and this is as true today as it was in the early 20th
century.
Eventually every trend does reverse. But it continues
much more often than it reverses. Gold has continued to new highs 8
times since 2001. It has not reversed to a relative low once.
In case after case, in good after good we see these giant bull (or
sometimes bear) markets that continue for year after year. As we look
back from the vantage point of the future and think back to what we were
saying at the beginning of the trend, we are amazed. “I was so
certain that gold could never get above $70 in 1974.” “I
laughed at Robert Prechter for predicting DJI 3500 in 1982.”
“I was absolutely certain that T-bill rates could never get to
zero.” But in all of these cases, the trend progressed far
beyond almost anyone’s ability to predict. All you could say
was, “The trend is my friend.” And this kept you long as
the market went up and up.
It is undoubtedly the same with the current bull market in
gold. This trend will probably go on much longer than anyone now
thinks. Indeed, the best prediction of the grand cycle bull move in
gold of the 1970s was made by Jim Dines. When asked, early in the
decade, how high gold would go, Dines replied that he did not know how high
gold would go or how far stocks would fall, but the two numbers would
cross. At the time he made that statement, gold was only a little
above $35/oz., and the DJI was close to 1,000. It seemed a fantastic
prediction. But on Jan. 21, 1980, gold hit an interday high (on the
Comex) of $875/oz., and the DJI closed at 872. That $875, by the way,
represented a 25-fold multiple for gold in nominal terms and a 12½
multiple in real terms. Between 1966 and 1982, the DJI fell by about
75% in real terms.
It is, of course, tempting to make the same prediction for
this grand cycle trend – that gold and the DJI will cross. I am
too much of a scaredy cat to make that prediction here, and I think that I
will follow the same policy I followed through the 1970s. Turn
bullish as the trend broke to the upside and then follow the trend until it
had a clear reversal (which turned out to be the giant one-day reversal of
Jan. 21, 1980). At that time, the trend was my friend. Today
the trend is still my friend. And the trend can be your friend
also.
As the trend in gold was nearing its end, circa 1978-79,
the speculative end of the precious metals group (silver, the exploration
stocks) came to life and made tremendous gains. I look for that to
happen as the present bull trend in gold nears its end. That will be
a warning sign. Before it happens, we are safe on the bull
side. After it begins, we still have a little time.
Now there are a few people who espouse fundamentals and do
not look at the trend. These people are called brokers. They
make their money on commissions, not profits. For this they need a
lot of customers, and so they follow the policy of telling the average
person what he wants to hear and what is useful to them (the paper money
theories of Foster and Catchings and Keynes and the fair price theory of
Thomas Aquinas). Brokers are friendly, but I do not advise listening
to them if you want to make money because they are not even trying to
discover economic truth. Furthermore the fundamentals being taught in
academia and published in newspapers and magazines are a collection of
trash. (Keynes was a deliberate fraud and did not believe Keynesian
economics.) To make sense of the markets with this false information
is almost impossible.
Howard S. Katz
****
I invite interested readers to subscribe to my fortnightly
(every 2 weeks) newsletter, the One-handed Economist. This
applies my general theory of economics to specific stocks and commodities,
making recommendations as to what to buy and what to sell. You may
subscribe by visiting my website, www.thegoldspeculator.com, and
pressing the Pay Pal button ($300) of by mailing a check for $290 ($10 cash
discount) to The One-handed Economist, 614 Nashua St. #122, Milford, N.H.
03055.