US Economy Faces Risk of 'Fiscal Cliff': Fed
Officials Tuesday, 1 May 2012 | 2:32 PM ET

By: Margo D. Beller
Special to CNBC.comTwo Federal Reserve officials
warned Tuesday that the U.S. could be heading for a "fiscal
cliff" at year's end if mandated tax increases and spending cuts are
implemented.
 |
|
CNBC
Federal Reserve Presidents, Charles Evans
and Dennis P. Lockhart
|
Charles Evans of the
Chicago Fed called the cliff a "big uncertainty" while Atlanta
Fed President Dennis Lockhart said there could be a "financial
shock" if markets begin to anticipate that Congress and the White
House do little to address this situation.
The expected tax
increases and spending cuts were triggered when a congressional
"super committee" failed to come up with a way of closing the
federal budget deficit.
Both Fed officials spoke
during the Milken conference in Los Angeles. Earlier Tuesday, on CNBC,
both agreed the slowing U.S. economy is disappointing, but differed on the
need for continued stimulus.
"I’d like
nothing better than to start raising rates before late 2014 on the strength
of a stronger economy," Evans told Squawk on the
Street.
Noting there's
"tremendous room" for more accommodation, the Chicago
Fed chief said that
"more liquidity would be helpful. It would ratify the idea that [Fed]
policy is going to be accommodative for a very long time to get things
going. Look, we might get lucky in the sense that ... the channel opens up
and we get a greater lift in the economy."
Rather than keeping
rates low until late 2014, Evans thinks the Fed should use "economic
triggers" on which to base accommodation such as keeping low rates if
the unemployment
rate is above 7.5 percent "unless inflation unexpectedly goes
up to a very high level, say 3 percent."
Lockhart is more
skeptical and also concerned about triggering higher
inflation. The Atlanta
Fed president said that while the first-quarter
GDP and March jobs
data were disappointing, "I am a bit reticent to pull the trigger on
any action. We have to see how the economy evolves. Pulling a number out
of the air is a bit too simplistic."
He added,
"There’s only so much we can do to stimulate loan demand, and to
change the risk appetite of the financial system or banks, so I’m
not sure that more really active stimulus in the form of
quantitative easing, for
example, would have that much of an effect. But the longer-term costs have
to be kept in mind, costs related to inflation expectations, for
example."
Both Fed presidents said
they know the continued low interest rates are hurting savers.
"We're in a tough
situation and the current slow recovery is hurting everybody," said
Evans.
Lockhart noted that
"we can only have one policy, and that policy is designed to support
the recovery. So unfortunately there are winners and losers."
— Reuters
contributed to this article.